-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support non base type items in structs #343 #465
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #465 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 87.17% 86.38% -0.80%
==========================================
Files 73 73
Lines 5013 5067 +54
==========================================
+ Hits 4370 4377 +7
- Misses 643 690 +47
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
@mjobuda Small request: could you rebase your relevant commits onto a branch that tracks ethereum/fe/master? It would be nicer to review these PRs if there weren't unrelated commits included. It's not a big deal, because the gh "Files changed" view is clean, but for more complicated changes, I often pull down PRs and step through the individual commits in my editor. To be clear, this is a very minor thing and I'm still happy to review contributions if the commit history isn't clean. |
@sbillig I'd love to! |
Basically:
You might have to work through conflicts during rebase in which case you:
Then you you push your branch again with the |
@cburgdorf i'm still not sure if i got it right, sorry but i don't get stuff like |
Ah, sorry, maybe I confused what Let's try that again.
Does this only show
You might have to work through conflicts during rebase in which case you: I. Resolve them
If that still doesn't work I'm happy to hop on a call with you or just feel free to join our team call today at 17:00 Berlin time :) |
I'm going to close this, as it seems to be abandoned (perhaps because I derailed it with git nonsense 😬). @mjobuda, please don't hesitate to reopen this if you're still interested. |
What was wrong?
Support non base type items in structs #343
How was it fixed?
To-Do